TSTP Solution File: SEV396^5 by Satallax---3.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Satallax---3.5
% Problem  : SEV396^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 18:06:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.37s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(ty_cS,type,
    cS: $i > $o ).

thf(ty_eigen__1,type,
    eigen__1: $i ).

thf(ty_eigen__0,type,
    eigen__0: $i ).

thf(ty_cR,type,
    cR: $i > $o ).

thf(sP1,plain,
    ( sP1
  <=> ( cS @ eigen__0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP1])]) ).

thf(sP2,plain,
    ( sP2
  <=> ( cR @ eigen__1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP2])]) ).

thf(sP3,plain,
    ( sP3
  <=> ( ( ^ [X1: $i] :
            ~ ( ( cR @ X1 )
             => ~ ( cS @ X1 ) ) )
      = cR ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP3])]) ).

thf(sP4,plain,
    ( sP4
  <=> ( sP2
     => ~ ( cS @ eigen__1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP4])]) ).

thf(sP5,plain,
    ( sP5
  <=> ( cS @ eigen__1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP5])]) ).

thf(sP6,plain,
    ( sP6
  <=> ( ( ~ sP4 )
      = sP2 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP6])]) ).

thf(sP7,plain,
    ( sP7
  <=> ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( cR @ X1 )
       => ( cS @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP7])]) ).

thf(sP8,plain,
    ( sP8
  <=> ( cR @ eigen__0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP8])]) ).

thf(sP9,plain,
    ( sP9
  <=> ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( ~ ( ( cR @ X1 )
             => ~ ( cS @ X1 ) ) )
        = ( cR @ X1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP9])]) ).

thf(sP10,plain,
    ( sP10
  <=> ( sP8
     => sP1 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[sP10])]) ).

thf(cTHM31_pme,conjecture,
    sP7 = sP3 ).

thf(h0,negated_conjecture,
    sP7 != sP3,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM31_pme]) ).

thf(h1,assumption,
    sP7,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h2,assumption,
    sP3,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h3,assumption,
    ~ sP7,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h4,assumption,
    ~ sP3,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h5,assumption,
    ~ sP9,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h6,assumption,
    ( ~ ( sP8
       => ~ sP1 ) )
 != sP8,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h7,assumption,
    ~ ( sP8
     => ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h8,assumption,
    sP8,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h9,assumption,
    ( sP8
   => ~ sP1 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h10,assumption,
    ~ sP8,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h11,assumption,
    sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(1,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h8,h11,h7,h8,h6,h5,h1,h2,h0])],[h8,h8]) ).

thf(2,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h7,h8,h6,h5,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h8,h11])],[h7,1,h8,h11]) ).

thf(h12,assumption,
    ~ sP1,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(3,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_conflict,[status(thm),assumptions([h10,h9,h10,h6,h5,h1,h2,h0])],[h10,h10]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ~ sP7
    | sP10 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ~ sP10
    | ~ sP8
    | sP1 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h12,h9,h10,h6,h5,h1,h2,h0])],[4,5,h1,h12,h10]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_imp,[status(thm),assumptions([h9,h10,h6,h5,h1,h2,h0]),tab_imp(discharge,[h10]),tab_imp(discharge,[h12])],[h9,3,6,h10,h12]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_be,[status(thm),assumptions([h6,h5,h1,h2,h0]),tab_be(discharge,[h7,h8]),tab_be(discharge,[h9,h10])],[h6,2,7,h7,h8,h9,h10]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h5,h1,h2,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h6]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__0)],[h5,8,h6]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_fe,[status(thm),assumptions([h1,h2,h0]),tab_fe(discharge,[h5])],[h2,9,h5]) ).

thf(h13,assumption,
    ~ ( sP2
     => sP5 ),
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h14,assumption,
    sP2,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(h15,assumption,
    ~ sP5,
    introduced(assumption,[]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ( sP4
    | sP5 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( ~ sP6
    | ~ sP4
    | ~ sP2 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ( ~ sP9
    | sP6 ),
    inference(all_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ~ sP3
    | sP9 ),
    inference(prop_rule,[status(thm)],]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_unsat,[status(thm),assumptions([h14,h15,h13,h3,h4,h0])],[11,12,13,14,h14,h15,h4]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negimp,[status(thm),assumptions([h13,h3,h4,h0]),tab_negimp(discharge,[h14,h15])],[h13,15,h14,h15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_negall,[status(thm),assumptions([h3,h4,h0]),tab_negall(discharge,[h13]),tab_negall(eigenvar,eigen__1)],[h3,16,h13]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(tab_be,[status(thm),assumptions([h0]),tab_be(discharge,[h1,h2]),tab_be(discharge,[h3,h4])],[h0,10,17,h1,h2,h3,h4]) ).

thf(0,theorem,
    sP7 = sP3,
    inference(contra,[status(thm),contra(discharge,[h0])],[18,h0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEV396^5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : satallax -E eprover-ho -P picomus -M modes -p tstp -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 00:22:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.37  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.37  % Mode: mode213
% 0.19/0.37  % Inferences: 24
% 0.19/0.37  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------